Skip to content
Wycord
Datasets

AfriMMLU (IrokoBench) vs Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG)

A verified, side-by-side comparison. Both records are status-checked by Wycord, so you are comparing what each actually offers today, not a stale listing.

AfriMMLU (IrokoBench)Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG)
Category
Datasets
Datasets
Type
Language / NLP
Language / NLP
Country
🌍 Pan-African
🇳🇬 Nigeria
Docs status
Docs live
Docs live
Licensing
Pricing
Free / open
Free / CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0
Verified
Unverified
Verified
Last verified
10 Oct 2026
10 Oct 2026
Tags
nlp, african-languages, question-answering, evaluation, benchmark
nlp, hausa, machine-translation, multimodal, image-captioning
Links
Website
Website Docs
Summary
Human-translated multiple-choice question-answering evaluation benchmark covering 16 to 17 African languages plus English and French, derived from a subset of MMLU across subjects like maths, geography and law. Distributed as CSV and parquet on HuggingFace and forms part of the IrokoBench suite (MMLU, MGSM, XNLI). Licensed Apache 2.0.
Multimodal Hausa-English dataset of 32,923 images with paired English/Hausa region descriptions (train/dev/test/challenge splits), post-edited by HausaNLP and Bayero University Kano translators for English-to-Hausa machine translation and image description.

AfriMMLU (IrokoBench) vs Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG) at a glance

AfriMMLU (IrokoBench) and Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG) are both listed under Language / NLP in Wycord's Datasets index.

AfriMMLU (IrokoBench) is based in Pan-African and Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG) in Nigeria.

Both currently show the status "Docs live".

On access, both are marked "No approval needed".

Over the last 30 days Wycord's probes measured 100% uptime for AfriMMLU (IrokoBench) (36 checks) and 100% for Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG) (36 checks).

Average response time on live probes was 180 ms for AfriMMLU (IrokoBench) and 233 ms for Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG).

Uptime and latency come from Wycord's own probes of each resource's website, documentation and repository, run every six hours.

How they differ

  • Pricing: AfriMMLU (IrokoBench), Free / open; Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG), Free / CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0.
  • Country: AfriMMLU (IrokoBench), Pan-African; Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG), Nigeria.
  • Verification: AfriMMLU (IrokoBench), Unverified; Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG), Verified.
  • Average latency: AfriMMLU (IrokoBench), 180 ms; Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG), 233 ms.

Topics

Both are tagged: nlp.

Only AfriMMLU (IrokoBench): african-languages, question-answering, evaluation, benchmark.

Only Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG): hausa, machine-translation, multimodal, image-captioning.

Common questions

Which has better uptime, AfriMMLU (IrokoBench) or Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG)?
They are level at 100% over the last 30 days.
Do AfriMMLU (IrokoBench) or Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG) need approval before use?
Both are marked "No approval needed".
Is the documentation for AfriMMLU (IrokoBench) and Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG) working?
Both show "Docs live" at the last check.
Where are AfriMMLU (IrokoBench) and Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG) based?
AfriMMLU (IrokoBench) is based in Pan-African; Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG) is based in Nigeria.

More comparisons

Full details: AfriMMLU (IrokoBench)Full details: Hausa Visual Genome (HausaVG)