Skip to content
Wycord
Datasets

Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA) vs Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database

A verified, side-by-side comparison. Both records are status-checked by Wycord, so you are comparing what each actually offers today, not a stale listing.

Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA)Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database
Category
Datasets
Datasets
Type
Health
Health
Country
🇳🇬 Nigeria
🌍 Pan-African
Docs status
Docs live
Docs live
Licensing
Pricing
Free
Free / open
Verified
Verified
Unverified
Last verified
10 Oct 2026
10 Oct 2026
Tags
health, facilities, geolocated
health, facilities, geocoded, csv, public-health
Links
Website
Website Docs
Summary
CSV of 39,081 geo-located Nigerian hospitals and clinics with name, type, LGA, state, coordinates and registration status; no login.
Geocoded inventory of 98,745 public-sector health facilities assembled from national master facility lists across 50 sub-Saharan African countries and islands. Records include names, facility types, admin locations and coordinates, distributed as CSV via figshare and Harvard Dataverse. Published in Nature Scientific Data (2019) under CC BY 4.0.

Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA) vs Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database at a glance

Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA) and Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database are both listed under Health in Wycord's Datasets index.

Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA) is based in Nigeria and Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database in Pan-African.

Both currently show the status "Docs live".

On access, both are marked "No approval needed".

Over the last 30 days Wycord's probes measured 83.33% uptime for Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA) (36 checks) and 100% for Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database (36 checks).

Average response time on live probes was 275 ms for Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA) and 85 ms for Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database.

Uptime and latency come from Wycord's own probes of each resource's website, documentation and repository, run every six hours.

How they differ

  • Pricing: Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA), Free; Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database, Free / open.
  • Country: Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA), Nigeria; Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database, Pan-African.
  • Verification: Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA), Verified; Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database, Unverified.
  • 30-day uptime: Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA), 83.33%; Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database, 100%.
  • Average latency: Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA), 275 ms; Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database, 85 ms.

Topics

Both are tagged: health, facilities.

Only Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA): geolocated.

Only Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database: geocoded, csv, public-health.

Common questions

Which has better uptime, Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA) or Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database?
Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database leads over the last 30 days: Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA) 83.33%, Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database 100%.
Do Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA) or Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database need approval before use?
Both are marked "No approval needed".
Is the documentation for Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA) and Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database working?
Both show "Docs live" at the last check.
Where are Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA) and Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database based?
Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA) is based in Nigeria; Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database is based in Pan-African.

More comparisons

Full details: Health Facility Registry (HUMDATA)Full details: Sub-Saharan Africa Public Health Facilities Database