APIs
Mono vs Okra
A verified, side-by-side comparison. Both records are status-checked by Wycord, so you are comparing what each actually offers today, not a stale listing.
Category
APIs
APIs
Type
Open Banking
Open Banking
Country
🇳🇬 Nigeria
🇳🇬 Nigeria
Docs status
Docs live
Docs live
Licensing
Pricing
Not listed
Not listed
Verified
Verified
Verified
Last verified
10 Oct 2026
10 Oct 2026
Tags
open-banking, data-access, kyb
open-banking, defunct
Summary
Open-banking data-access provider for account, identity and transaction data, with KYB tooling. Acquired by Flutterwave in Jan 2026 but still operates independently. Ships a dev sandbox Docker image.
Open-banking data provider that pioneered the category in Nigeria.
Mono vs Okra at a glance
Mono and Okra are both listed under Open Banking in Wycord's APIs index.
Both are based in Nigeria.
Both currently show the status "Docs live".
On access, both are marked "No approval needed".
Over the last 30 days Wycord's probes measured 100% uptime for Mono (36 checks) and 100% for Okra (36 checks).
Average response time on live probes was 4978 ms for Mono and 948 ms for Okra.
Uptime and latency come from Wycord's own probes of each resource's website, documentation and repository, run every six hours.
How they differ
- Average latency: Mono, 4978 ms; Okra, 948 ms.
Topics
Both are tagged: open-banking.
Only Mono: data-access, kyb.
Only Okra: defunct.
Common questions
- Which has better uptime, Mono or Okra?
- They are level at 100% over the last 30 days.
- Do Mono or Okra need approval before use?
- Both are marked "No approval needed".
- Is the documentation for Mono and Okra working?
- Both show "Docs live" at the last check.
- Where are Mono and Okra based?
- Both are based in Nigeria.