CHT Core Framework vs SORMAS
A verified, side-by-side comparison. Both records are status-checked by Wycord, so you are comparing what each actually offers today, not a stale listing.
CHT Core Framework vs SORMAS at a glance
CHT Core Framework and SORMAS are both listed under Health-tech in Wycord's Open Source index.
CHT Core Framework is based in Kenya and SORMAS in Nigeria.
Both currently show the status "Docs live".
On access, both are marked "No approval needed".
Over the last 30 days Wycord's probes measured 100% uptime for CHT Core Framework (36 checks) and 100% for SORMAS (36 checks).
Average response time on live probes was 124 ms for CHT Core Framework and 184 ms for SORMAS.
Uptime and latency come from Wycord's own probes of each resource's website, documentation and repository, run every six hours.
How they differ
- Country: CHT Core Framework, Kenya; SORMAS, Nigeria.
- Average latency: CHT Core Framework, 124 ms; SORMAS, 184 ms.
Topics
Both are tagged: health-tech.
Only CHT Core Framework: javascript, community-health, offline-first.
Only SORMAS: java, disease-surveillance, outbreak-response.
Common questions
- Which has better uptime, CHT Core Framework or SORMAS?
- They are level at 100% over the last 30 days.
- Do CHT Core Framework or SORMAS need approval before use?
- Both are marked "No approval needed".
- Is the documentation for CHT Core Framework and SORMAS working?
- Both show "Docs live" at the last check.
- Where are CHT Core Framework and SORMAS based?
- CHT Core Framework is based in Kenya; SORMAS is based in Nigeria.