DHIS2 Core vs SORMAS
A verified, side-by-side comparison. Both records are status-checked by Wycord, so you are comparing what each actually offers today, not a stale listing.
DHIS2 Core vs SORMAS at a glance
DHIS2 Core and SORMAS are both listed under Health-tech in Wycord's Open Source index.
Both are based in Nigeria.
Both currently show the status "Docs live".
On access, both are marked "No approval needed".
Over the last 30 days Wycord's probes measured 100% uptime for DHIS2 Core (36 checks) and 100% for SORMAS (36 checks).
Average response time on live probes was 193 ms for DHIS2 Core and 184 ms for SORMAS.
Uptime and latency come from Wycord's own probes of each resource's website, documentation and repository, run every six hours.
How they differ
- Average latency: DHIS2 Core, 193 ms; SORMAS, 184 ms.
Topics
Both are tagged: java, health-tech.
Only DHIS2 Core: hmis, health-data.
Only SORMAS: disease-surveillance, outbreak-response.
Common questions
- Which has better uptime, DHIS2 Core or SORMAS?
- They are level at 100% over the last 30 days.
- Do DHIS2 Core or SORMAS need approval before use?
- Both are marked "No approval needed".
- Is the documentation for DHIS2 Core and SORMAS working?
- Both show "Docs live" at the last check.
- Where are DHIS2 Core and SORMAS based?
- Both are based in Nigeria.