OpenMRS Core vs SORMAS
A verified, side-by-side comparison. Both records are status-checked by Wycord, so you are comparing what each actually offers today, not a stale listing.
OpenMRS Core vs SORMAS at a glance
OpenMRS Core and SORMAS are both listed under Health-tech in Wycord's Open Source index.
OpenMRS Core is based in Kenya and SORMAS in Nigeria.
Both currently show the status "Docs live".
On access, both are marked "No approval needed".
Over the last 30 days Wycord's probes measured 100% uptime for OpenMRS Core (36 checks) and 100% for SORMAS (36 checks).
Average response time on live probes was 45 ms for OpenMRS Core and 184 ms for SORMAS.
Uptime and latency come from Wycord's own probes of each resource's website, documentation and repository, run every six hours.
How they differ
- Country: OpenMRS Core, Kenya; SORMAS, Nigeria.
- Average latency: OpenMRS Core, 45 ms; SORMAS, 184 ms.
Topics
Both are tagged: java, health-tech.
Only OpenMRS Core: emr, medical-records.
Only SORMAS: disease-surveillance, outbreak-response.
Common questions
- Which has better uptime, OpenMRS Core or SORMAS?
- They are level at 100% over the last 30 days.
- Do OpenMRS Core or SORMAS need approval before use?
- Both are marked "No approval needed".
- Is the documentation for OpenMRS Core and SORMAS working?
- Both show "Docs live" at the last check.
- Where are OpenMRS Core and SORMAS based?
- OpenMRS Core is based in Kenya; SORMAS is based in Nigeria.